A More Advanced Geo-Political Team
Through this plan... we will find a long-term best balancing point for our Nation's Operating Loan aka The National Debt.
Strategic Pivot : Government Control/Ownership
The goal is to build a second "Separation of Powers" which promotes expertise relevant to growing the economy.
The Congressional voting approval model is involved with both... but relevant to some aspects of the budget... the private sector is now involved.
Joint-Manages the qualifying requirements for Project Management and Engagement system.
We can't really have this unless companies and governments work together to make it possible.
Both the Fortune Board, and the US Government get to vote to modify or create Addendums which define collaboration and access to opportunities to collaborate on these critical layers required to safe-gaurd the free-market ideal.
They can choose to restructure and organize their voting weighting as they choose.
They can mobilize for expertise needed in a given situation as it relates to setting the Project goals and qualify criteria.
The voting % and Veto requirements as the relate to Addendum revision/additions must be approved by the 3 branches referenced on this page.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Presidential Privileges.
* Can vote to require a Bailout... but unless they have a dominant majority without a veto, the Fortune 100/500 Board gets to set the budget.
* Can vote to make payments on the National Debt from the Government's revenue streams.
* Can vote to increase the budget divided across citizen identities... for the purpose of driving engagement with Industrial Policy goals, thus driving skill development in the workforce.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
The Congressional voting approval model is involved with both... but relevant to some aspects of the budget... the private sector is now involved.
Joint-Manages the qualifying requirements for Project Management and Engagement system.
We can't really have this unless companies and governments work together to make it possible.
Both the Fortune Board, and the US Government get to vote to modify or create Addendums which define collaboration and access to opportunities to collaborate on these critical layers required to safe-gaurd the free-market ideal.
They can choose to restructure and organize their voting weighting as they choose.
They can mobilize for expertise needed in a given situation as it relates to setting the Project goals and qualify criteria.
The voting % and Veto requirements as the relate to Addendum revision/additions must be approved by the 3 branches referenced on this page.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Presidential Privileges.
* Can vote to require a Bailout... but unless they have a dominant majority without a veto, the Fortune 100/500 Board gets to set the budget.
* Can vote to make payments on the National Debt from the Government's revenue streams.
* Can vote to increase the budget divided across citizen identities... for the purpose of driving engagement with Industrial Policy goals, thus driving skill development in the workforce.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
Strategic Pivot : Fortune 100/500 Board Ownership/Control
Joint-Manages the qualifying requirements for Project Management and Engagement system.
We can't really have this unless companies and governments work together to make it possible.
Both the Fortune Board, and the US Government get to vote to modify or create Addendums which define collaboration and access to opportunities to collaborate on these critical layers required to safe-gaurd the free-market ideal.
They can choose to restructure and organize their voting weighting as they choose.
They can mobilize for expertise needed in a given situation as it relates to setting the Project goals and qualify criteria.
The voting % and Veto requirements as the relate to Addendum revision/additions must be approved by the 3 branches referenced on this page.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Proposals for President's network contracting privileges.
* Can vote on and approve the budget of Bailouts and Stimulus packages.
* Can vote to make payments on the National Debt from Fortune 100/500 Board managed sales-tax.
* Can vote to increase the budget divided across citizen identities... for the purpose of driving engagement with Industrial Policy goals, thus driving skill development in the workforce.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
We can't really have this unless companies and governments work together to make it possible.
Both the Fortune Board, and the US Government get to vote to modify or create Addendums which define collaboration and access to opportunities to collaborate on these critical layers required to safe-gaurd the free-market ideal.
They can choose to restructure and organize their voting weighting as they choose.
They can mobilize for expertise needed in a given situation as it relates to setting the Project goals and qualify criteria.
The voting % and Veto requirements as the relate to Addendum revision/additions must be approved by the 3 branches referenced on this page.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Proposals for President's network contracting privileges.
* Can vote on and approve the budget of Bailouts and Stimulus packages.
* Can vote to make payments on the National Debt from Fortune 100/500 Board managed sales-tax.
* Can vote to increase the budget divided across citizen identities... for the purpose of driving engagement with Industrial Policy goals, thus driving skill development in the workforce.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
Strategic Pivot : Platform Branch Expertise - Protected Autonomy
The unique exception is the Identity & Access Management Grid... which is served by the private sector, but primarily operated by Cyber-Force.
In truth, Cyber-Force will be positioned to regulate requirements through the Major Market Verticals structures. This is what enables advanced security in the modern age.
Joint-managed approval of key layers. Companies work together to build the strongest most secure advanced network of inter-connected platform components.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Data standardization and security requirement recommendations alongside Cyber-Force.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
12/1/24 - Something I've been toying with lately... is how you give proper representation to the central open-source layer itself. I had originally thought they would propose budgets that the businesses driving the operational authority would be able to approve/reject. An alternative approach could give the central layer ~20-30% of the voting authority... leaving the other ~70-80% to be won by convincing the businesses in that vertical to agree. This would of course, leave the political and broader private sector to have their voting authority to challenge, or force changes to the central layer driving the market and security... based on their insights into the market as well.
This all provides leverage for different boards of expertise to force changes... or protect the broader market from extortion by parties controlling these critical infrastructures. That is the next "Separation of Powers" we need in the modern age. This incorporates different levels of expertise to accomplish that modern age "Separation of Powers", in how we drive critical architecture, thus preventing it from being vulnerable to lack of expertise driving the decision... as well as extortion of the broader market, and required critical architecture by the controlling interests.
In truth, Cyber-Force will be positioned to regulate requirements through the Major Market Verticals structures. This is what enables advanced security in the modern age.
Joint-managed approval of key layers. Companies work together to build the strongest most secure advanced network of inter-connected platform components.
Unique responsibilities/privileges:
* Data standardization and security requirement recommendations alongside Cyber-Force.
Together, these 3 branches protect Free-Market collaboration on critical levels that tie sectors together. They protect the Continuous Improvement and Critical Placement strategy necessary for advanced security and collaboration. Without this strategy, it's easier for any one entity to sway the overall system for their benefit.
12/1/24 - Something I've been toying with lately... is how you give proper representation to the central open-source layer itself. I had originally thought they would propose budgets that the businesses driving the operational authority would be able to approve/reject. An alternative approach could give the central layer ~20-30% of the voting authority... leaving the other ~70-80% to be won by convincing the businesses in that vertical to agree. This would of course, leave the political and broader private sector to have their voting authority to challenge, or force changes to the central layer driving the market and security... based on their insights into the market as well.
This all provides leverage for different boards of expertise to force changes... or protect the broader market from extortion by parties controlling these critical infrastructures. That is the next "Separation of Powers" we need in the modern age. This incorporates different levels of expertise to accomplish that modern age "Separation of Powers", in how we drive critical architecture, thus preventing it from being vulnerable to lack of expertise driving the decision... as well as extortion of the broader market, and required critical architecture by the controlling interests.
The Plan in Motion - Part 1
Through this plan... we will find a long-term best balancing point for our Nation's Operating Loan aka The National Debt.
Strategic Pivot : Balancing the Budget in Perpetuity Through a Stronger Model
Working with the MMV's to determine a dynamically allocated tax the private sector controls on SaaS products that streamline operations. These more advanced infrastructres are what will reduce costs more than anything else.
We should rally together these critical industries into the more advanced team ideology they need to be a part of for us to be the strongest team we are able to.
They deserve to be properly placed as equally important in the overall conversation.
It is interesting to think of the ways certain steering interests in a company can be passed on could become a point of vulnerability... in the critical sectors that affect the way we are able to manage society.
This bumps up on exactly why Communist models were considered a potential solution to this problem. But this is limiting.
The dynamic I want to protect... is as in the case of my advanced Psyche Records journaling Eco-System... which also positions us for far more ethical correlation in the science...
We want to protect the ability for very serious parties to put together a business plan for an efficient solution worthy of investing in. This keeps us focused on quality, and effectively placing talent in critical positions.
We should rally together these critical industries into the more advanced team ideology they need to be a part of for us to be the strongest team we are able to.
They deserve to be properly placed as equally important in the overall conversation.
It is interesting to think of the ways certain steering interests in a company can be passed on could become a point of vulnerability... in the critical sectors that affect the way we are able to manage society.
This bumps up on exactly why Communist models were considered a potential solution to this problem. But this is limiting.
The dynamic I want to protect... is as in the case of my advanced Psyche Records journaling Eco-System... which also positions us for far more ethical correlation in the science...
We want to protect the ability for very serious parties to put together a business plan for an efficient solution worthy of investing in. This keeps us focused on quality, and effectively placing talent in critical positions.
The Plan in Motion - Part 2
Mutually Assured Success for the Modern AI Age
Strategic Pivot : Mutually Assured Success for the Modern AI Age
In this age, to truly worry about immigration and crime entering our country... you really have to care about the data we can get from allies and enemies. If you aren't... then you aren't really thinking about the dynamics involved.
It's not a good system if we have to make phone calls to every office in a region, or set of regions an immigrant may have been... and have every office sorting through paperwork and old-school file systems to get us the data we need on each new identity entering the country.
We need all hospital records and birth certifactes to be part of a unified strategy to truly do this to the best of our ability.
It's not a good system if we have to make phone calls to every office in a region, or set of regions an immigrant may have been... and have every office sorting through paperwork and old-school file systems to get us the data we need on each new identity entering the country.
We need all hospital records and birth certifactes to be part of a unified strategy to truly do this to the best of our ability.